Our transparent, multi-step review workflow ensures academic rigor and quality at every stage of the publication process.
Authors submit their original manuscript through the journal's official submission system, ensuring compliance with the Author Guidelines, formatting requirements, and ethical standards.
The Editorial Office conducts an initial screening to verify:
Manuscripts failing to meet basic requirements are returned to authors for correction or desk rejection.
The Editor-in-Chief / Managing Editor assigns the manuscript to a subject-specific reviewer based on disciplinary relevance and expertise.
The manuscript is sent to an independent reviewer under a blind peer review system, ensuring anonymity of the reviewer. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript on methodological rigor, clarity, relevance, and contribution to existing literature.
Reviewers submit detailed reports with one of the following recommendations:
Based on reviewer feedback, the Editor communicates the decision to the author along with consolidated comments and required revisions, if any.
Authors revise the manuscript and submit a revised version along with a point-by-point response to reviewers' comments within the stipulated timeframe. Revised manuscripts may be sent back to reviewers or evaluated by the editor.
Upon successful revision and editorial approval, the manuscript is formally accepted for publication.
After acceptance, authors must accept copyright terms from the dashboard, complete the publication fee payment, and provide the final manuscript strictly in the prescribed journal format.
The accepted manuscript undergoes copyediting and formatting to ensure clarity, consistency, and compliance with publication standards.
The final article is published under the journal's open access model, assigned publication details (DOI), and made available for global scholarly access.